• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Duke lacrosse case     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatRacialHoaxes, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)

Type: yago:WikicatMedia-relatedControversiesInTheUnitedStatesyago:WikicatTrialsInTheUnitedStatesgeo:SpatialThingyago:WikicatPeopleFromDurham,NorthCarolinayago:WikicatSportsScandalsInTheUnitedStatesyago:Abstraction100002137yago:Act100030358yago:Action100037396yago:Activity100407535yago:Alumnus109786338yago:Attempt100786195yago:CausalAgent100007347yago:Choice100161243yago:Cognition100023271yago:Content105809192yago:Controversy107183151yago:Deception100752431yago:Decision100162632yago:Disagreement107180787yago:Dispute107181935yago:Event100029378yago:Falsification100751145yago:Fraud100753685yago:Gossip107223170yago:Informing107212190yago:Intellectual109621545yago:Issue105814650yago:LivingThing100004258yago:Move100165942yago:Object100002684yago:Organism100004475yago:Person100007846yago:PhysicalEntity100001930yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100yago:Report107217924yago:WikicatHoaxesInTheUnitedStatesyago:Wrongdoing100732746yago:YagoLegalActoryago:YagoLegalActorGeoyago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntitySupreme Court of the United States caseyago:Scandal107223811yago:Scholar110557854yago:SpeechAct107160883yago:Test100791078yago:Trickery100752954yago:Whole100003553yago:Wikicat2006Hoaxesyago:WikicatDelbartonSchoolAlumniyago:WikicatDukeUniversityAlumniyago:WikicatPeopleFromTheResearchTriangle,NorthCarolinayago:WikicatPossibleCut-and-pasteMovesyago:WikicatRace-relatedLegalIssuesInTheUnitedStatesyago:WikicatRacialHoaxes New Facet based on Instances of this Class

The Duke lacrosse case was a widely reported 2006 criminal case in Durham, North Carolina, United States in which three members of the Duke University men's lacrosse team were falsely accused of rape. The three students were David Evans, Collin Finnerty, and Reade Seligmann. The accuser was Crystal Mangum, a student at North Carolina Central University who worked as a stripper and dancer. The rape was alleged to have occurred at a party hosted by the lacrosse team, held at the Durham residence of two of the team's captains on March 13, 2006. The case's resolution sparked public discussion of racism, sexual violence, media bias, and due process on campuses, and ultimately led to the resignation, disbarment, and brief imprisonment of the lead prosecutor, Durham County District Attorney Mike